Officiating.com
   
Officiating ID:
  
Password:
  
 
  User Sign In   
 
Search Officiating.com:
 
Featured items
Start Officiating
Official Forum
Officiating Communities
 Basketball
What’s Wrong with NCAA Women’s Mechanics? — Part III
The mechanics learning curve

Other parts in this series:
  What’s Wrong with NCAA Women’s Mechanics? — Part I — One plus, and many minuses -- but they're not minutiae
  What’s Wrong with NCAA Women’s Mechanics? — Part II — The only plus we got so far
  What’s Wrong with NCAA Women’s Mechanics? — Part III — The mechanics learning curve
  What’s Wrong with NCAA Women’s Mechanics? — Part IV — The hand-off from Trail to Lead
  What’s Wrong with NCAA Women’s Mechanics? — Part V — Line coverage and calling out of your primary

ow it's time to get into the details. As I have said, these are not just minutiae.

Minus #1: The mechanics learning curve

Except for the elite crews who have WNBA experience, call many (50+) games per year, or have the benefit of working with top notch officials several nights per week, the use of pro mechanics hasn't worked. There's a simple explanation: even after three years: College officials are still learning how to do it.

Most of us can learn anything, but we usually need practice when it involves technical changes at three different positions on the floor. Since adoption of the WNBA mechanics was an all or none proposition three years ago, all of us had to learn the critical points of each position — Lead, Center, and Trail — all at once in order for the whole crew to be functional. Unfortunately, the greater part of the learning curve has fallen to adapting at the Lead and Trail positions.

Continued...


Please sign in to read the rest of this article:
  
  
  

Not yet a member of Officiating.com?
Click here to join and receive $25 in free product!


Copyright © Officiating.com 1999-2008. All Rights Reserved.
The Officiating.com website is part of the RightSports Network